I've been thinking about what to give up this year. I've done some interesting stuff in the past -giving up TV, make-up (quite the sacrifice for me, I'm afraid), etc. I've had a much more difficult time deciding on something this year. And, really, this year's Lent has more to do with adding a practice than taking one away. Let me explain.
Ever since Junior High, my most important spiritual discipline has been writing and journalling. I discover that rehashing my day turns into confession, turns into prayer, turns into "oh, there you are, God! You've been staring me in the face through all of this and I've been bopping along, totally oblivious." But now, as a grad student, writing sometimes feels like a chore. On top of that, with a blog and a lovely host of readers, I often find myself writing with an audience in mind. I'm not doing the soul-searching that I crave. I imagine this is a pretty decent foreshadowing of what pastors experience every week as they approach the text of Scripture. Yes, a bit of personal devotion would be nice but the lure of the crowd is probably more overwhelming than they'd like to admit. I fear this will be the case for me, at any rate. I have recently been rereading Henri Nouwen's book, The Genesee Diary, in which Nouwen writes, "Is there a quiet stream underneath the fluctuating affirmations and rejections of my little world? Is there a still point where my life is anchored and from which I can reach out with hope and courage and confidence?" That still point, for me, comes in writing, in writing for myself and God alone. And this is the discipline I intend to embrace over Lent this year.
Practically, this means:
* I've scoped out the perfect hidey-spot in which to drink coffee and write one evening a week. I've never seen anyone from the seminary there. No one knows me and I can feel free to go off in search of that illusive "still point."
* I will only be checking in on this blog and others once a week (loophole: Lent doesn't count on Sundays and feast days!) I may or may not post. If I do, it will be good. If I don't, just let it go, ok?
* Here are a few links for y'all to try out. If you start to miss me, these ladies will probably do the trick.
I met Betsy last year. She's got a good head on her shoulders and she's funny to boot. I'm especially interested in the blogging she's done about some horrible Focus on the Family articles which, in essence, call singleness a sin!
Lorraine comments here a lot. We may be world's apart as far as vocation and denominational affiliation but I love her writing and she makes me laugh and, before I can help it, I'm thinking about something new and interesting or even something old and mundate from a new and interesting vantage point.
Alright, now I really have to go get me some of those ashes! Have a blessed and reflective Lent, all of you!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
MJ,
You have been one of my favorite things about blogging. Have a blessed Lent. (Hope I bump into you at the Fest-evil of Wrath and Biting [I borrow the name from the great Tim Thompson], too.)
aaaghhh!! meg - i gave up make-up two years ago too...the people i worked with consistently asked me why i was going naked. it took me a few days to figure out what they meant (didn't help that they said it in their thick scottish accents). thanks for introducing me to your faithful blog readers - way to put the pressure on :)
I read the article you linked and didn't see anything about sin in the thing. I don't think it even referenced God. It appears to be more of an interesting interpretation of Sex in the City or something; not casting any moral (sin) judgments on singleness, but presenting what sometimes/often/can happen.
John
I also read the article you linked and a few others, and I'm torn in what to think about it. If you're interested, I talked a bit more about it here.
Also, I'm giving up movies and TV for Lent. Hopefully the quieter apartment will lend itself to more reflection, etc.
'K, first of all, thanks for the nod. Very sweet of you. And second, I hope you have a blessed Lent. (I'm not giving up TV or blogging but I'm giving up mindlessly surfing if it turns out that what I planned to watch isn't on. Which should net me several additional hours per week for prayer).
Meg:
When the annoying relatives ask every Christmas, "Why aren't you married?" It's one thing to know you're called to singleness and to tell them, "Because God has called me to a life of singleness and service for his greater glory" and another to tell them "well, um, I just don't know, it just the way thing ahve happened."
Is singleness a sin? It may be, under certain circumstances. The underlying question is one of vocation: are you called to marriage or not? If you are, and the long-term habits of your life aren't heading you in that direction, then you may very well be imitating Jonah, running away from what God wants you to do.
And, of course, if God has called you to singelness, then getting married would have 'Big Mistake or Bad Idea" stamped all over it.
I see that Boundless article aimed at making people think about their choices and the reasons behind them. Marriage doesn't occur by accident; you have to make a lot of choices to get there and stay there. Long-term singleness, which I will define as, oh say, getting to thirty unmarried, doesn't occur by accident either. It just that the choices are less overt.
Dave
Hey Dave--
This is an interesting position, but don't you think it borders on Pelagianism? Seriously, if it is our choices alone that make us sinful or not sinful, then what role does the concept of original sin play in our lives? Isn't it perfectly reasonable to consider that someone who hasn't met the right partner, but also would like to be in a committed relationship might merely be a victim of the sin-infected order of the universe.
Would it not be better for a person to "choose" singleness over a marriage in which God is not honored?
And isn't "knowing God's call for your life" a terribly subjective situation? It seems that plenty of people have claimed to be "called" to amoral things. Wouldn't it be better for people to make prudent decisions based on a balance of biblical tradition, altruism, self-interest, reason, emotion, and the wise guidance of peers?
Also, at what point can we as a human species agree that we have fulfilled God's command to be fruitful and multiply? The human species already has a presence in every continent and ecosystem on earth, and our population is bordering on the edge of dangerously unsustainable. Poor distribution of strained resources have already led to mass starvation in parts of the globe.
Luctetius:
Pelagian? Gosh, I hope not. I don't think I'm advocating works righteousness by saying that some people are called to be single and some are called to be married and therefore need to act on those callings. Obedience to God's calling is what the Christian life is all about.
Nor am I saying that once one figures out a calling to marriage, one should run right out and do so. Think of deciding you're called to be a doctor. You don't run out and open your own practice, but slowly, over years of schooling and residency, figure out which speciality is yours and where to practice, etc. Your call hasn't changed, it's gotten more specific over time and through the discerment built into the process.
I think our positions may be closer than you realize. This advice you offer:
"Wouldn't it be better for people to make prudent decisions based on a balance of biblical tradition, altruism, self-interest, reason, emotion, and the wise guidance of peers?" is pretty close to how one, in a Reformed sense, determines one's call. That's how I would advise people to figure out if they're called to be married or not, and more specifically, who he or she is called to marry.
Call, in the Reformed tradition is always a multi-part thing. Given our propensity to be self-decieved about call, it has to be confirmed in the larger commmunity. That's why congregations in Presbyterian churches _always_ get to vote on their ordained leadership. If Fred thinks he's called to be a deacon and the congregation and/or the session don't agree, then he shouldn't be, or won't. I can decide I should be pastor of XYZ church, but if the PNC, congregation, or presbyter disagree, I won't be.
That sort of community involvement should also be present in choosing a spouse. If your friends have tremendous reservations about your choice of a spouse, it should give you pause. (Most cases, it doesn't unfortunately.)
Dave
Meg,
I've been reading your blog for months now. You inspire me!
I greatly enjoy your humor! Often times I feel a sense of enlightenment after reading your posts. I commend you on your accomplishments, and know that you will go far in the future.
I hope you have a blessed Lent.
tibia money tibia gold tibia item runescape money runescape gold tibia money tibia gold runescape gold runescape accounts tibia gold tibia money runescape money runescape gp buy runescape gold tibia gold tibia item buy runescape money runescape gold runescape items tibia money tibia gold
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,a片,情趣用品
A片,A片,AV女優,色情,成人,做愛,情色,AIO,視訊聊天室,SEX,聊天室,自拍,AV,情色,成人,情色,aio,sex,成人,情色
免費A片,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛
情色文學,色情A片,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,言情小說,愛情小說,AV片,A漫,AVDVD,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,成人交友,成人電影,成人貼圖,成人小說,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人遊戲,愛情公寓,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色小說,成人論壇
免費A片,日本A片,A片下載,線上A片,成人電影,嘟嘟成人網,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,微風成人區,成人文章,成人影城
A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖
Post a Comment